A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving potential neighbours over the construction of a wall in a coastal site in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted national awareness following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of planning breaches, environmental issues, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a very publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a corporation director respectively, seek to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining produced by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging authorization by creating a wall further than the boundaries of their web page, resulting in an encroachment with a Particular Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore places are issue to stringent controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably in a sensitive coastal setting such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their scheduling permission, and say the wall, which can be partially designed, is in the proper position. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The pair accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal organizing disputes, where views of the sea are both equally very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable efforts from the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the site, according to sworn proof referenced from the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-superior drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions, a picture which has given that turn out to be emblematic of the depth from the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they have been intended to Acquire visual proof from the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how The 2 Males entered the drinking water throughout critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the positioning turned The most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations post about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of actions ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached on.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were coated in detail with the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether or not interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key moment in the lawful timeline.
Within the Main with the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely Feely retain the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning documents, maps, and ailments connected for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental safety and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private look at, insisting alternatively that it is about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing link to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply just wanting to establish a loved ones dwelling in accordance Using the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Specific Space of Conservation and say that all performs are actually carried out determined by Experienced guidance and accepted options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering the sea throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying information.
The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over design of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times article about René Collier observed which the businessman had previously been involved with regional advocacy on organizing and environmental issues, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from extremely distinctive Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both of those the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal solution.
As the High Court proceedings carry on, the end result remains uncertain. The court need to decide if the wall as developed complies with arranging permission and no matter if any encroachment right into a Specific Spot of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing circumstances. Yet the human element continues to be central: neighbours who have to Dwell alongside one another very long following the legal prices are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design will work at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case increase outside of that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Furthermore, it underscores how rapidly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when fundamental difficulties like environmental defense and property rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays an area of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre on the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter whether it will in the end be altered, taken off, or done as planned will rely on the courtroom’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.